<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: [Update: Poll Added] Justice Scalia&#8217;s All-Time Favorite Dissent: A Wolf in a Wolf&#8217;s Clothing</title>
	<atom:link href="http://resipsablog.com/2008/07/28/scalias-favorite-dissent/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://resipsablog.com/2008/07/28/scalias-favorite-dissent/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Jun 2010 03:35:26 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 020033</title>
		<link>http://resipsablog.com/2008/07/28/scalias-favorite-dissent/comment-page-1/#comment-150</link>
		<dc:creator>020033</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:36:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://resipsablog.com/?p=396#comment-150</guid>
		<description>My favorite is Justice Scalia&#039;s dissent in In Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. Department of Education, No. 05–1508 (April 17, 2007), where he repeatedly benchslaps his favorite target, Justice Stevens:

For some, policy-driven interpretation is apparently just fine … [b]ut for everyone else, let us return to Statutory Interpretation 101 ....  This case is not a scary math problem; it is a straightforward matter of statutory interpretation ....  The sheer applesauce of [JUSTICE STEVENS&#039;S] statutory interpretation should be obvious ....  Contrary to the Court and JUSTICE STEVENS, I do not believe that what we are sure the Legislature meant to say can trump what it did say.

Slip op. at 3, 5-6, 13.

http://sophisticmiltonianserbonianblog.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/j-scalia-unplugged/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My favorite is Justice Scalia&#8217;s dissent in In Zuni Public School District No. 89 v. Department of Education, No. 05–1508 (April 17, 2007), where he repeatedly benchslaps his favorite target, Justice Stevens:</p>
<p>For some, policy-driven interpretation is apparently just fine … [b]ut for everyone else, let us return to Statutory Interpretation 101 &#8230;.  This case is not a scary math problem; it is a straightforward matter of statutory interpretation &#8230;.  The sheer applesauce of [JUSTICE STEVENS'S] statutory interpretation should be obvious &#8230;.  Contrary to the Court and JUSTICE STEVENS, I do not believe that what we are sure the Legislature meant to say can trump what it did say.</p>
<p>Slip op. at 3, 5-6, 13.</p>
<p><a href="http://sophisticmiltonianserbonianblog.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/j-scalia-unplugged/" rel="nofollow">http://sophisticmiltonianserbonianblog.wordpress.com/2007/04/18/j-scalia-unplugged/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
